|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Why the seeming lack of interest in 1964 Topps Giants, 1971 Topps Super?
I know the two sets I listed as examples don't fit the 2.5" x 3.5" standard that became the norm with the 1957 Topps set. In fact, they're quite a bit larger. But when looking at some of the cards, they're really nice, and they cost only a fraction of the regularly issued sets.
Why aren't these sets more in demand? Is it that the cards are lacking diversity in the photography? Is it a matter of sheer size that turns collectors off? There are some nice cards-the '64 set has Willie Mays, Mickey Mantle, Hank Aaron, Roberto Clemente, etc. The 1971 Topps Super set is nice, too, with a good assortment of the top stars from the period. One would think these would make nice starter sets for people who want to explore two different years, while not spending a small fortune. Some insight would be greatly appreciated, guys. Thank you!
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
1971 Topps SUper
I collect the 1971 Topps Supers. I think the set is kind of neat, even if it is an oddball set.
The fact the card edges "chip" and dent have always kept me from seriously collecting them Given their oddball size...makes it really hard to keep in a Mn condition. I have yet to find a good holder for them as well. Nice set though with a good selection of super stars. And what about the 1980 Topps Superstars? You forgot to mention that oversize "set".....and its only 60 cards. Z Wheat Last edited by Zach Wheat; 11-22-2014 at 12:38 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I think the Giants suffer from being overproduced in '64. You could buy them in bricks of 1000 for a song back in the 70's as one dealer bought almost all of the returns. They are a great set though. The '70 and '71 Supers are also nice, especially the ones with the Yankee Stadium backdrops but I think they are just too thick and finding ones that are centered is a bear.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I think most collectors have issues with the size and thickness...sounds like my wife.
Thanks, you've been a great crowd. Enjoy Slade.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Don't know the production numbers but here is an article that explains why the '64 giants are reasonably priced even 50 years later.
http://www.sportscollectorsdaily.com...ant-stars-set/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
64 &71
I have both sets . They both have great photos. They are only disappointing if you collect them to make money
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Gudbuy T'Jane!
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FSH:1962 Topps Kaat PSA 8/1964 Topps Giants PSA 7/1976 Topps PSA 8's *Lower Prices! | Bunker | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 03-03-2014 04:43 PM |
1952 Topps Slaughter plus Three 1964 Topps giants | GrayGhost | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 3 | 05-10-2013 07:13 PM |
FS: 1971 Topps Super #54 AL Kaline SGC 88 | Oneofthree67 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-30-2013 09:08 AM |
Any interest in trading 1971 Topps baseball coins? | scotgreb | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-06-2012 07:56 PM |
1970 / 1971 Topps Super Box | sschauer | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 03-30-2010 04:42 PM |