![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Has anyone observed a price premium with the new PSA holographic holder over the previous one? Is willingness to buy higher with the new look? Personally I think the slight change is more aesthetically appealing.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I offer more due to the less of a chance of the holder being a fake...though someone on the board may correct me on that
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Less chance of a bump
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
less chance of wasting money hoping for a bump...
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have sold numerous cards with the new holder. I have not noticed any sort of premium bump for it.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a buyer, I prefer any PSA holder except from the first few years. I would attach absolutely no premium to the newest ones. The new holders are nice; at least PSA didn't do a stupid change as SCG a year or two ago. Their holders from year 2000-on have been very consistent and I applaud them for that. ---Brian Powell
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SOLD 1935 R309-2 Goudey Premium Indians Team Premium | TheBig6 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-28-2014 10:58 AM |
New PSA Holder? | AMBST95 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 11-04-2013 10:20 AM |
WTB: 1939 Goudey Premium or 1939 World Wide Gum Premium - Joe Gordon | bcbgcbrcb | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-26-2012 08:59 AM |
New PSA Holder? | rp12367 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-24-2012 09:27 PM |
Is this just an old PSA holder? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-22-2004 04:39 PM |