|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Was this a common flaw with the 1960 set ? I've seen several of the 1960 Topps cards with small print flaws. This example still garnered a grade of 9 and looks perfect other than print mark.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes the little bullseyes were fairly common from 59-63. Don't think the TPG's view it so bad unless there are a lot of them...nice card BTW!
Last edited by chalupacollects; 10-13-2017 at 07:20 AM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
As for the investor it's interesting to see how some will ignore snow or corner touches and focus only on centering and marks. This is why people are shocked when their near mint card comes back at a 5 and not an 8 or 9 !!
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
looks like a nice card to me.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Took me a minute to find it which I think helps. If it were on The Mick’s forehead that’d be another story. Though I wonder if the grading companies see it that way as well.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
.... AND it's centered almost perfectly.....which I absolutely love. But that darned dot is all I see....
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 10-13-2017 at 09:57 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1960 Mickey mantle print defect | johnnyboggs | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 09-09-2016 06:51 PM |
| Goodwin 1952 Topps Mantle 2 Mark with Qual | MetsBaseball1973 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 03-03-2016 08:26 PM |
| FS: Ritter w/ Print Mark *SOLD* | t206blogcom | T206 cards B/S/T | 6 | 10-12-2013 08:21 PM |
| Print mark on 1959 topps #317 | shprintza | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 06-06-2009 05:46 PM |
| T206 - Print mark question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-22-2008 10:16 AM |