![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In preparing for Bobby’s new piggyback submission group, I began going through my raw 1960s cards today. I came across two raw 1963 Sandy Koufax cards - #136.
I never noticed it before, but one card looks different from the other. The second card’s image is a little darker. You can also see darker shaded areas on his jersey. I’ve seen a few other cards like this for sale on a certain auction cite. Is this a printing variation or is the card a reprint? I’m pretty sure the top card is authentic. I appreciate any assistance or opinions you all can provide. I hope everyone is safe and well in these crazy times. Thanks. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Very tiny images. You need to upload them at full size to some image site, then post the links here.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I’m technologically challenged, and will have to figure out how to do that. Thanks.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The pics are small, but there is a check you can do easily.
Most fakes are printed on computer printers, and all areas will have a very fine dot pattern. Originals will show black areas especially as solid color. There was a lot of variance in how dark the black ink was. Some is solid black some a less solid black. They can sometimes be found with a nearly transparent gray. If you look at the score printed in the baseball, it should be some version of a solid black printing on both. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|