|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  M101-4 and M101-5 Help 
			
			Posted By: James Walker, Jr. What is a good basis for "multipliers" for the various backs? | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  M101-4 and M101-5 Help 
			
			Posted By: Todd I just like to keep the M101 topics alive.  James, the subject of relative scarcity for the m101-4s and m101-5s has been discussed before--try the search function. | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  M101-4 and M101-5 Help 
			
			Posted By: leon Yes we have been over this before. I love collecting backs so here we are again.  As always it is supply and demand that equals value. As Todd noted it doesn't matter if there is only 2-3 Holmes to Homes cards in the world, if the demand is not high the value won't be either. I am sure you could pick that statement apart but for the most part it's true.  With that being said I have seen some back varieties go fairly high ($100-$300 for a common) and still not be the value I would think they should be due to their rarity.  Here is a list of known backs and multipliers (of common players/backs) that are only my idea...... I have only seen 2 of the Holmes to Homes and 2 of the Everybody's.  I believe there are more of the Everybody's than there are the Holmes to Homes hence the higher multiplier. | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  M101-4 and M101-5 Help 
			
			Posted By: spaceops03 Leon, | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  M101-4 and M101-5 Help 
			
			Posted By: Tim Newcomb To me this is one of the most intriguing unanswered questions in our hobby. | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  M101-4 and M101-5 Help 
			
			Posted By: Todd (nolemmings) would look a lot like Leon's, although I'd probably bump Mall Theatre up to 6 and Everybody's down to 6. Tim is right about the m101-4 F&Bs being scarcer than their counterparts from m101-5, maybe even moreso than in his multiplier list. Also, I'll whine about it again-- I have not been shown a confirmed m101-5 with a TSN back. Assuming they exist, I would give them a multiplier of at least 3. | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| WTB: (3) M101-2's & (1) M101-7 | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 08-20-2008 01:34 PM | 
| WTB: Low Grade M101-5's and M101-4's | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 07-13-2008 07:07 PM | 
| Nice work Tim Newcomb and Todd Schultz! M101-4 and M101-5 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-05-2008 11:47 AM | 
| M101-5/M101-4 article: call for information-- LAST appeal for info | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 65 | 10-23-2007 08:58 PM | 
| Sporting News M101-4 and M101-5 Company Backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-27-2006 09:41 PM |