|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Is this photo original?? 
			
			Posted By: dan mckee | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Is this photo original?? 
			
			Posted By: Greg Ecklund Same photo that is on every BF2 | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Is this photo original?? 
			
			Posted By: Steve Murray 
 | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Is this photo original?? 
			
			Posted By: D. Bergin I think the question is: Do BF2's use Real Photo types or Printed Photo Types? | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Is this photo original?? 
			
			Posted By: dan mckee Yes that was what I was trying to ask. My Walter Johnson that was removed from a sewn togehter blanket doesn't have this dot pattern. Dan. | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Is this photo original?? 
			
			Posted By: D. Bergin What if you look at it under a loupe. Some scanners really exaggerate the dot pattern on printed photos and make them look worse then they are. | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Is this photo original?? 
			
			Posted By: dan mckee Yes I will try that tonight, hopefully you are correct. I just remember a bunch of these recently being sold on ebay w/o the pictures attached. Dan. | 
| 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Is this photo original?? 
			
			Posted By: Greg Ecklund Sorry Dan...misread your question. | 
| 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Is this photo original?? 
			
			Posted By: Randall Adams Those are my BF2's, here is a better scan of the Weaver.  | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 |