|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  T206 Question: Good Price? 
			
			Hi everyone. I just bought a SGC graded T206 Nap Lajoie Portrait with an Old Mill back. There is only 1 Old Mill back Lajoie Portrait in the PSA pop report and only 1 in the SGC report. It was in low grade, but is this considered a scarce back for a Lajoie? Would it be a premium at all to T206 collectors? I didn't pay much, so any information is greatly appreciated from the T206 collectors here. Thanks, Andrew | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  I think you'll find... 
			
			...That Old Mill will sometimes bring a light premium for commons, but not much of a bump for HOFers.  Nice card, to be sure, but not much excitement in Old Mill.
		 
				__________________ Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			Yeah, Old Mill backs are not super tough, but just wanted to know since it is not common for a Lajoie Portrait to have a Old Mill back. Like in the PSA report, there is 18 Old Mill Lajoie with bat versus the lone portrait. Thank you for the info.   | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			When I first saw your post, I initially thought similar to T206Collector -- that the Old Mill back wouldn't give much of a bump for a HOFer front.  For example, T206museum.com lists the Old Mill as a 1.3 multiplier (ie, 30% bump) for common fronts but no increase for someone like Lajoie. But then I checked on VCP (given that you had already combed through the PSA and SGC pop reports), and they only record 2 sales of a Lajoie Portrait with Old Mill back (and SGC 30 for $180 and a PSA 4 for $750), versus innumerable sales with Piedmont/SC fronts. So I wonder if you actually might be onto something. 
				__________________ collecting primarily T206, 1940 Play Ball, 1947-66 Exhibits, 1952 Bowman, 1964 Topps Giants, Yankees HOFers. E-mails preferred over PM. | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			All other things being equal, most collectors will take an Old Mill over a Piedmont or Sweet Cap.  Typical premium is 15-20% in my experience.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
   | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Am aware of the whole Old Mill overprint scandal, but I was under the impression that the perpetrators of that fraud had made their amends and that the site remained reliable.  Am I mistaken? Also, my impression is that the T206.org valuation calculator uses the same numbers as T206museum.com, with the difference that T206museum lists the individual back and grade multipliers. 
				__________________ collecting primarily T206, 1940 Play Ball, 1947-66 Exhibits, 1952 Bowman, 1964 Topps Giants, Yankees HOFers. E-mails preferred over PM. | 
| 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  hindu back 
			
			t206.org, their valuation is really off on hindu backs
		 | 
| 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 | 
| 
			 
			#10  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 I've found that it seems to undervalue the higher grade cards (it puts a common PSA 6 at $125 when for the most part they're going for $150-200, or a PSA 7 for $250 when they're going northward of $350), and takes no account for many of the "uncommon" or "desirable" commons -- Doyle (NY), Magee portrait (non-error). I've found that no one pricing source is perfect for valuing cards, so in general you can't rely on just one. But between SMR, VCP, and the T206 calculators it gives a good sense of things. Of course, the more rare the item, then the less reliable the data. Thanks, --S 
				__________________ collecting primarily T206, 1940 Play Ball, 1947-66 Exhibits, 1952 Bowman, 1964 Topps Giants, Yankees HOFers. E-mails preferred over PM. | 
| 
			 
			#11  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			Just speaking for myself, but I will pay top dollar for a tough combo, but only if it is something I need/want.  Pretty much the only time it hurts is when someone else needs it too.  I was willing to pay way over market for one combo that I needed for a very long time, but got it at half of what my bid was, just because no other folks needed the card. I have also been blown out of the water on some cards that I did not think were that special. I think that is one of the fun things about the T206 front/back combos. I paid top dollar for my SC350/460 Factory 25 Joss when I need that combo and paid well above market for a SC 350,25 Collins a couple weeks ago. It only brings the money if you find one person willing to pay for it at a set price or two folks in an auction. Not sure if that is clear or not, but hjope all is well, Bob Last edited by B O'Brien; 12-01-2010 at 06:30 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#12  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Last edited by Rob D.; 12-01-2010 at 07:17 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#13  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			I wonder who won that Lajoie Cycle? Bob | 
| 
			 
			#14  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| T206's for sale | WabitTwax | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 10-26-2009 09:56 AM | 
| Question About T206...Burns CHI AL | green rhino123 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 10-19-2009 03:20 PM | 
| T206 EPDG Back Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 05-23-2009 01:12 PM | 
| T206 reprint question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-20-2004 11:22 AM | 
| A Question For The T206 Collectors | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-25-2003 08:14 PM |