 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
12-26-2013, 02:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I think SGC labels that do not have the two different numbers on them might be looked at differently. I thought I remember SGC saying at one time their guarantee did not cover those cards without the two grades. I could be wrong so hopefully someone will chime in and correct me if I am wrong. Personally, I avoid SGC cards with the single grade on them.
Edit to add: I think SGC cards with the two grades AND a sticker on the back do not carry a lesser value. Last edited by DeanH3; 12-26-2013 at 02:48 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Under valued (or underappreciated autographs) | daves_resale_shop | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 15 | 07-30-2012 12:54 PM |
| Are all PSA 5s equally valued? | wmullis | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 09-26-2011 05:12 PM |
| Mastro 0% on PSA Cards Valued Over $1000 - Why? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 01-16-2008 07:46 PM |
| D303 - under appreciated and valued | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-08-2003 04:33 PM |
| Most under-valued vintage set? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 04-01-2002 12:13 PM |
Threaded Mode