|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Great Research. Based on your earlier discussions, I also did a deep dive on the series analysis. Although a longer response is needed, my first point would be to suggest removing the Shean and Graham from the initial list of SP's. I think it's easier to think in "classes" rather than SP/non SPs...while total populations may be similar, the 14 other sps are virtually identical in terms of back appearance and populations, whereas Shean and Graham are clearly different, though total populations might be similar.
For the record, in my categorization, I have Shean in Graham in the same class as players like Austin, Bates and Becker...it would be interesting to hear your thoughts on including Shean and Graham with that group. Mac |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| My T206 Plank theory....New Follow-up info | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 96 | 12-18-2020 01:14 PM |
| T205 Question/Theory | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 01-07-2012 10:59 AM |
| The enigmatic T206 350/460 series....theory, checklist & backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 02-11-2009 01:38 PM |
| T205 info requested -- Part II: Rare backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-11-2006 08:01 PM |
| Pseudo E95 blank backs; a bit more info | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-09-2006 10:29 PM |