|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Which approach has served the hobby better? Allowing it to degrade? Or doing some conservation? Either approach can be considered valid. One preserves the card for longer than the other. The other keeps it "original". What if TPG found a way to accommodate conservation so that it was mentioned? I get that any conservation work would change the grade under todays standards. And that a higher number = more money. And that doing that work and getting that money without disclosure is leaning heavily towards the dishonest side of things. And I don't think that's the way to do things either. But I also don't think that having ongoing damage stabilized is a horrible thing. I view most other alterations the way most of us probably do. Trimming, crease removal, rebuilding corners, all things that really shouldn't be done, or if done shouldn't be given a grade as an original card would be. (although for some stuff they're accepted as long as there's disclosure) Steve B |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Photobucket problems fixed | buymycards | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-15-2012 04:35 PM |
| VCP Problems..Fixed My Fault | Piratedogcardshows | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 04-26-2012 04:43 AM |
| Site Fixed Julie | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-27-2005 08:05 PM |
| Does Baseball Need to be Fixed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-16-2003 08:26 PM |
| LEW LIPSET AUCTION FIXED!!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-29-2001 05:36 PM |