 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
05-25-2018, 03:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
That's not a scanned image - you can see a shadow of the person taking the picture. The image has also been taken at an angle. Scanned images are always 100% flat.
I see two possible scenarios here: One - it's an older PSA flip, and standards were different then. It's possible that staining like this didn't automatically bring a card below a 3. Two - the stains were considerably lighter when it was graded, and have darkened since. Or, it's actually mold that has continued to grow and spread. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Birth of Card Collecting, an article I submitted to SCD | jerrys | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-11-2016 07:21 AM |
| My oldest self submitted PSA 10 | lsutigers1973 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 01-16-2014 11:02 PM |
| Most forged of 2013 (submitted to PSA) | Deertick | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 12-27-2013 07:42 PM |
| Submitted 118 T206 PSA 8 for review | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 123 | 01-21-2009 07:00 PM |
| Dihigo card submitted to SGC by third party | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-29-2005 12:33 PM |
Threaded Mode