|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ted, that would generally jibe with my experience. The blatant print flubs predominantly are from the white stock run. I do have (I am looking at it but cannot seem to find a scan of) a gray back Zivic with missing background color, but that is the only missing ink card i can recall in gray, though clearly there is at least one sheet of them that made it out of the factory.
One more idiosyncratic observation: I recall a higher number of ghost prints with gray back cards. I suspect the paper was 'thirstier' than the white stock and more easily fouled.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 09-19-2020 at 01:44 PM. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SEDiMENT IN THE PAPER STOCK | lowpopper | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 02-05-2019 06:16 PM |
| Photographic paper stock question. Please help | EYECOLLECTVINTAGE | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 12-14-2017 12:10 PM |
| T206 Bill Hinchman (Paper Stock) | T206Collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 11-28-2016 08:00 AM |
| N172 Old Judge - Thin Paper Stock (help needed) | h2oya311 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-07-2012 06:26 PM |
| Cracker Jack paper stock 1914 vs 1915 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-12-2007 08:24 PM |