|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Now it makes sense why the rebuttal was incredibly vague about how the OP is untrue and the only specific was about a phone call and not the contract.
The contract sure seems to give the cosigner only 60%. I don't see the BP mentioned at all, but maybe that relates to the sellers reserve column. I don't know why, but I expected a vaguely professional real contract for a six figure plus deal. OP's claims seem to be on the main points factually correct. Hard to see 60% (possibly even lower in reality with the vague or non-existent BP references in this 'contract') being fair and reasonable. If they did indeed cherry pick only the good items as OP said, and thus are not doing a ton of work with low value stuff to get rid of, OP has been bent over. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Leland's and Clean Sweep merging. | edhans | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-06-2025 11:31 PM |
| Steve Verkman and Clean Sweep Auctions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 55 | 08-30-2015 12:22 PM |
| Clean Sweep Auctions? | jimjim | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 06-26-2015 12:35 AM |
| Clean Sweep Auctions | sports-rings | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 8 | 09-20-2013 04:23 PM |
| Question re: Clean Sweep/Verkman Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 05-09-2004 04:48 PM |