 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
09-27-2004, 09:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
E Card Question
Posted By: Brian McQueen
I think it had a lot to do with the team he played for. The Washington Senators were for the most part, a pretty bad team during the years of 1909-1912 when many of these sets were released. Their players, Johnson included, weren't featured in many of these sets. Since so many "e" sets are between 30-50 cards, I think they wanted to take the more prominant players from the better teams in the league. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about value of T206 card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 89 | 04-06-2007 10:11 AM |
| OT - Boxing card question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 06-09-2006 09:30 PM |
| Card question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-10-2006 06:40 PM |
| Question about this card ... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-22-2006 12:50 AM |
| Modern Card Question: Short card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-11-2002 09:51 PM |
Threaded Mode