 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13
02-18-2010, 09:04 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Joe, wouldnt a Print defect be random? meaning it could happen to ANY card in the set?
how about this.....for a specific print run of the E90-1 series (which we know there are several), they used an older (or different) printing plate to make the reverse...the resulting cards ALL looked a bit different than the first few series backs...is this a print defect? dont think so Peter, do you have any of these backs? Last edited by ScottFandango; 02-18-2010 at 09:07 AM. Reason: spelling 
|
| Tags |
| e90-1 variation |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| !st known 1940 Play Ball hi# Superman ad back | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 09-27-2008 01:56 PM |
| How many T207s make a set ??? variations ??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 05-09-2007 12:26 PM |
| WANTED: 1954 Bowman Back Variations | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-08-2006 02:07 PM |
| Looking for 1933 WWG back variations | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-12-2006 12:08 PM |
| Looking for W514's - Nice examples & Back Variations | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-03-2006 12:17 PM |
Threaded Mode