 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
07-17-2011, 03:44 AM
|
||||
|
||||
You'll never be able to remove the shellac in layers. the shellac bonds with whatever ink it was covering, it usually makes the ink appear darker, that's why I'm sure you have some solid signatures on the ball. But the instant you start to sand off the shellac you're going to regret it. The ink will most definitely come off with it. Even if you're delicately wet sanding or fine sanding all you're going to have is a matte finished shellac ball.
Sorry for the bad info, but I've seen people try this over and over and they always come up regretting it and saying 'should have left it be". Pictures?
__________________
History of the Baseball Official National & American League Base Ball Guides now available! Here 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 1926 OAL Ball Yankees/Tigers Game Used - Pennock signed | rholmes | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 10-10-2010 10:58 AM |
| '55 Yankee Team Signed Ball - Mantle (ss), Stengel, E Howard, Berra, etc - 27 sigs PSA/DNA | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 3 | 07-06-2008 10:59 AM |
| Signed Ruth Ball question | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 7 | 06-02-2008 11:12 PM |
| Phila A's signed ball and T206s from an estate auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-20-2006 10:36 PM |
| Thompson's 1951 HR ball | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-14-2005 02:37 PM |
Threaded Mode