 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12
03-10-2012, 03:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks... I believe in "buff"
I wanted to get the general consensus that "buff" (or similar) was part of the printing process. That seems to be extremely likely (if not confirmed). My rationale for asking is that I picked up the following card that I believed had missing red ink. A "buff" color does appear where the red would be in a few cases. I wanted to make sure it wasn't faded/chemical red. I believe this to be a legit missing red ink card of Gilbert, and a few board members concur.
In the scans, notice that the one with red ink does, in fact, have an under layer of buff for the "S" in St. Louis. Also look at the full scan where there is absolutely no red or buff in the belt. BTW, there's also a nice slight ghost on this card to boot. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 for sale | vic | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 10 | 09-04-2011 08:11 PM |
| T205, T206 & T207 Please Help..... | 1975Reds1976 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-09-2011 10:04 PM |
| FS: T203, T206, T213-2, T227, M116, 48-49 Leaf | Abravefan11 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 04-17-2011 09:30 AM |
| T205 / t206 fs | scottglevy | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 7 | 01-05-2011 09:23 PM |
| *For Sale* SGC graded - T200, T205, T206, T210 and others | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 10-04-2006 07:25 AM |
Threaded Mode