Steve - With all do respect you misunderstand me.
Every one of the three groups you referenced I was referring to with this in my post: "There are subsets that number less than 34 that we as collectors have created to categorize certain cards."
Yes, 14 southern league cards were not printed with Hindu, but when they were printed with Old Mill, the actual number printed is 48. Same with Piedmont 350. The fact that 14 were not printed with Hindu is not evidence that less than 34 were printed later.
You can classify the 150 only cards as you like, but none were printed with a back subset less than 34.
Excluding Wagner and Magie let's look at the regular 150 Only subjects.
All were printed with the following backs:
Piedmont 150
Sweet Caporal 150 No.25
Sweet Caporal 150 No.30
Sovereign 150
Hindu
All were no-prints with:
Sweet Caporal 150 No.649 (Powers is the lone exception*)
Up until the point they were discontinued, 67 subjects in the set followed that exact pattern of distribution. Nothing about them was unique except for when they were discontinued. Again this isn't evidence of any special treatment during production.
I hope this clears up the point I was trying to make but please ask me any followups.
Edit* Of the 150 only group Powers was printed with SC150/649, but like the others this does not make how he was printed unique. Until being discontinued his card followed the same distribution as 33 other group 1 subjects.
Last edited by Abravefan11; 02-17-2013 at 04:59 PM.
|
02-17-2013, 03:14 PM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode