|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
MK qualifiers really need to be evaluated on a card by card basis. Sometimes it is for the smallest little mark that you can't even find on the card and sometimes it is for writing all over the back. It's all over the place. I think there are collectors out there that don't want any qualifier for any reason and then there are some who don't care about them at all. It's really up to you.
When it comes to T206's, I'm a collector who is very into backstamps on the cards. These always get an MK qualifier and it doesn't bother me at all because I want the backstamp. Others don't like these stamps though. It's all just each collector's preference. To each his own. Thanks AndyH
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar. The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here My Online Trading Site: Click Here Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com My Humble (Outdated) Blog: Click Here |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looked Very Scary to me... | Northviewcats | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 06-28-2011 01:37 PM |
| Does this Lajoie looked trimmed to you? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 01-11-2009 06:35 PM |
| Ever Wondered What A Colgan's Chip Looked Like? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 02-12-2008 09:52 AM |
| does this sgc holder looked tampered with? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 10-21-2005 05:00 PM |
| I just looked at the t206's listed on ebay and...... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 10-10-2005 02:37 PM |