Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJJ
J, I re-read the statement. Based on the statement, it appears that REA would not have left them in without the consignor agreeing to make available additional information. REA was not allowing these items to continue, without additional information provided, or made available to the public. As a result, the consignor withdrew them. That is my read of the statement.
|
I understand that everyone will read things a little different I guess I don't get the same translation out of the statement:
This lot has been withdrawn at the request of our consignor due to REA’s efforts to provide additional information regarding provenance being excessive (which they may have been). We are honoring the consignor’s request and apologize for any inconvenience to the consignor and to bidders.
The items are gone and until they appear again, it's a moot point. So until REA comes on, I guess we will never really know what happened.
05-01-2013, 08:26 AM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode