|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Great list John. I would probably rank 66 and 67 ahead of 63. But of course the Rose is a major factor. In fact, I would probably rank 61 and 67 as tied for 1st, followed closely by 66. Those 67 highs with Seaver, Carew, and B. Rob are killers. Just think if the 66's had that kind of star power in the last series, they would probably be first by a mile. Heck the 591 common can run you $100 in ExMt. I built back to 59 and have pretty much quit, even though I have decent starter sets going back to 53. I had "set builder fatigue" and now have 3 kids! It expensive, as we all know, but so much fun. Maybe go back and tackle it again someday. I look at various websites every day though, especially this one, so once it's in your blood it's hard to get out.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rank These Cards? Thanks. | MattyC | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-26-2013 12:49 PM |
| Rank your favorite sets? (eye appeal) | asphaltman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 04-27-2011 09:17 PM |
| 1933 Goudey Set For Sale - PSA Rank #16 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-05-2008 01:22 PM |
| Rank these Matty cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 08-31-2007 09:37 PM |
| prewar set value increases, rank them? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 10-11-2006 10:50 PM |