|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't see any wrinkles, but I do see what appears to be a tiny speck of paper loss on the back of the Successful Farming Baker - bottom right corner, the "A" in IOWA. Then again, it could just be that filthy scanner bed. I've never seen that much dust. If it's paper loss, that submitter got a gift of a 4.
Edited to add two things: 1) Are the scans of the Successful Farming Baker from the same source? The front looks different than the back. The back scan has a lot fo dust, where the front scan doesn't. Also, the black SGC gasket is a much darker black compared to the front scan. 2) I agree with the poster above that said, "I think if you are buying mid grade cards that look nicer then you should expect an issue that isnt easy to see. I am not sure why else these cards could have graded out that way if not for a tough to see defect." Last edited by vintagetoppsguy; 10-22-2013 at 08:04 AM. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Another in house shill bidder for an ebay seller??? | whiteymet | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-06-2013 07:41 PM |
| Auction house problems | thxforthebp | WaterCooler Talk- Off Topics | 6 | 02-13-2012 07:22 PM |
| Auction House Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 03-15-2009 09:23 AM |
| auction house's | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-14-2007 01:50 PM |
| TAX in auction house auctions? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 04-17-2003 12:52 PM |