|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
They do allow a variety of faults as taken into account when figuring the grade.
I do think they went too easy on this one. I had one T206 that I've had since around 81/82 that looks really good and came back a 40. When I asked at the Shriners show they showed me the very light erasure on the back. I hadn't noticed it in the 30+ years I've owned it. The same for the other very nice one that was a 50. Just a tiny crease on one border. One that's hard to see without a magnifier. The guy I spoke to said the grade was a cumulative grade so 2-3 tiny faults could make the difference between 80 and 50. I felt a lot more confident in the grades after the explanations and being shown the small faults. I do also think that some of the cards I've seen recently have gotten rather lenient grades. (Including one I had done at the show) Steve Birmingham |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 "printer's mark" and sheet layouts | t206hound | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 89 | 07-09-2017 09:06 PM |
| Need some Expertise: Odd[?] printer's mark and "wet sheet transfer"?-- | dougscats | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-13-2014 12:13 PM |
| T206 - 4 card "butter" back lot - $65 - SOLD | t206hound | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 01-18-2013 03:46 PM |
| The Hall of Fame is "just another museum" according to Mark McGwire | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-22-2009 10:30 AM |
| "SWIFT" E-card back stamp | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 01-27-2005 10:04 AM |