 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
08-17-2014, 07:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Tom I recently made this exact point to another board member just a couple weeks ago. We're all aware and have discussed the inconsistencies of third party grading here many times over until we've become blue in the face.
The discrepancy and inconsistency in grading though that we see from both PSA and a SGC in regards to the 1914 Crackerjack set is down right laughable. With the differential in value between a vg, vg/ex or ex example being so great it's pretty disheartening. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is there a grading thread? | 67_Palmer | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 20 | 06-25-2013 07:28 PM |
| Removing excessive tobacco staining? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 03-31-2009 11:56 PM |
| E96 Philadelphia Caramel staining..common? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-18-2008 03:05 PM |
| creasing or staining? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 07-23-2005 02:40 PM |
| Strange staining for a Cracker Jack... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-07-2004 10:06 PM |
Threaded Mode