|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
I haven't checked them all, Lundgren might be. Lindaman and Ewing both come with EP , so probably just massively shortprinted.
But they might be. That still needs study to find a 150/350 difference. If there isn't one it becomes a question of carryover vs wrong back. Which is a topic for another thread. We've already strayed too far. To get back on track, any other T210 oddities? Another missing gloss? Steve B |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SSPC oddity | steve B | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 05-25-2011 10:49 PM |
| that's odd.....your fave oddity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 04-20-2009 10:25 PM |
| Printing oddity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-28-2006 05:47 PM |
| T206 Oddity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-09-2005 11:30 AM |
| Mastro oddity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-13-2003 11:32 AM |