 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
10-22-2014, 07:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for all of the help. The B&W cards are thin - they don't feel like a normal card - almost more like a picture but not quite. The lot had several cards from the late 40's - not saying that these are not reprints - but if they are from '47, it wouldn't be out of the ordinary from the era of cards that I received. Admittedly, they are in better shape than the late 40's Bowman cards. Is there anything that I would see that would make it clear (i.e. reprint in small print somewhere?)
Thanks
__________________
2024 Collecting Goals: 53-55 Red Mans Complete Set 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help with issue identification - edited to add different pictures | kailes2872 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 10-23-2014 10:18 AM |
| Help with issue identification | kailes2872 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 10-04-2014 08:38 PM |
| 48/49 Leaf Printing Issue or Non-Issue? | letsgocapitals | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 01-01-2013 06:05 AM |
| Help ID'ing 1941 PCL issue & 1940s Nashville Vols issue? | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-01-2011 10:34 AM |
| vcbc issue #6, is it worth buying a back issue... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-26-2006 10:07 AM |
Threaded Mode