 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22
04-18-2015, 02:48 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Kind of what I thought, however I did discover that there are some people that are just going for the 1-310. Personally, if I was going for this, I would probably go 1-310, and maybe a few of the stars in very low grade for the high numbers. The nice thing about this hobby is you can collect how you want.
__________________
Excellent people to deal with: bnorth, Republicaninmass, obcmac, marcdelpercio, Michael Peich, dougscats, jimivintage, mybuddyinc, Luke, Bocabirdman, ncinin. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1952 Topps complete set | robsbessette | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 71 | 04-09-2014 05:25 PM |
| WTB Complete Set of 1952 Topps Look-N-See | 25801wv | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 07-24-2013 11:09 AM |
| Anyone here building a complete 1952 Topps set? | Zone91 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 23 | 05-23-2013 05:05 PM |
| FS: 1952 Topps Near Complete (274) Low Number Set All PSA Graded GPA 5.13 | t206kid | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 04-21-2013 10:46 AM |
| So what is really considered having the complete set? T-206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 09-18-2008 12:45 PM |
Threaded Mode