|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
On old 1920-30's exhibits, there are no mainstream reprints you would see all the time. Most of what you will see are homemade ones where the front looks close but generally you can tell the contrast is not right as well as the back color does not look right (also its usually only Ruth, Gehrig rookie, Cobb that you will see). The other thing you will find are some that have good laser prints on the front and have been rebacked, on the hard to tell if fake ones they used real exhibits cards as the backs so those are tough to tell.
My advise is post a picture here, and let the experts judge. I do know a raw Ruth that looks very questionable is on ebay right now that did not pass grading, the back looks like a newer 47-66 exhibit to me. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 'Judging the Authenticity of Photographs' Hardcopy/Paper back book | drcy | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 09-10-2014 08:21 AM |
| Share your unusual tips/tricks for analyzing an autograph for authenticity | markf31 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 17 | 01-23-2013 02:20 PM |
| 'Judging the Authenticity of Photographs (Fifth Edition)' $10 shipp | drc | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 02-22-2012 03:06 PM |
| New Edition Judging the Authenticity of Photos / Unuse Proof | drc | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 04-03-2011 01:37 PM |
| Judging Authenticity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-10-2006 11:39 AM |