|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Undergraded ??? | |||
| Yes |
|
6 | 11.32% |
| No |
|
16 | 30.19% |
| Graded just right |
|
31 | 58.49% |
| Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
absolutely look correctly graded. They have nice eye appeal for their grades but all have issues some fairly serious which dictates their grades. I could honestly see the Devlin getting a lower grade before i could see any of the others grading higher. I wouldn't drop over if i sent the Devlin in and got a 30 or 35.
Last edited by glynparson; 10-31-2015 at 07:01 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Undergraded Cards: Show Yours | GasHouseGang | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 25 | 02-02-2014 01:30 PM |
| Undergraded??? | wolfdogg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 02-15-2013 07:51 AM |
| Undergraded? | Chicago206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 03-25-2010 02:10 AM |
| Undergraded???....lets see 'em | wolfdogg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 12-01-2009 10:38 AM |
| Truly undergraded or trimmed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-15-2008 10:31 AM |