|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, but so is the 57 Bakep and the 58 Herrer, and maybe the 52 Campos black star or missing front border. All famous "variations".
What is the hobby definition of a true variation anyway ? What is your definition ? Intentional change made to a card ? What about double prints with differences like the 52 Mantle ? Intentional ? Variation ?PSA has been listing a 61 Fairly with a smudge of green in the baseball on the back as a variation. Is it just a print defect ? Who is to say ? Who is the arbiter ? No wrong views in my mind. Hobby conundrum. Some variants catch on, others do not. If you have one, it tends to be a variation, or you want it to be
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1970 topps printing error ? Proof ? Help | MGHPro | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 15 | 09-03-2015 08:23 AM |
| 1970 topps proofs? Printing error ? Help | MGHPro | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 09-02-2015 03:16 PM |
| 1971 Topps Vada Pinson - Pretty Cool | Gr8Beldini | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 01-29-2015 09:03 AM |
| 92 topps printing error? | TAVG | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 2 | 01-12-2015 08:04 AM |
| T206 printing error variations...still considered premiums? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-29-2007 08:49 AM |