 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
01-30-2016, 05:01 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Curious as to what people would think of this hypothetical situation, if it were possible for it to happen....
Two friends (A and B) both are interested in an item that doesn't pop up often, but typically would sell for around $500. But since it doesn't come up for sale often, both are willing to pay $1,000+. In talking, they both realize they are likely going to bid each other up on the item, so they come to an agreement to have Friend B stay away from bidding on this item and let A get it for ~$500, and B will be able to get the next one that comes available for ~$500. Is this scenario wrong? Seems like the buyer's version of shilling - wouldn't be illegal but is it ethical? |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| my top secret want lists being revealed | sflayank | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 01-07-2016 01:13 AM |
| my top secret want lists being revealed | sflayank | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 12-31-2015 10:59 AM |
| Autograph News Live - criminals or just cowards? | Michael Frost | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 186 | 10-25-2013 10:36 PM |
| criminals and heroes of the t206 set | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 01-11-2009 07:03 PM |
| secret want list revealed dealers will kill for this list | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-18-2008 10:06 AM |
Threaded Mode