 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
01-30-2016, 04:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Lists
I was kidding Patrick, but in the end it does not matter what I think...or you think. There is no real hobby recognized definition of a master set or a variation.
And what is a super set ? How does it differ from a master set ? Should master sets include only true variations where an intentional change was made in the card ? Should recurring unintended print defects be included in a master set ? In a super set ? How many times must a defect occur before it is recurring ? Who decides all this anyway ? Does each person have the right to define the set they collect the way they want. ? How many have to agree with something for it to be a hobby norm ?  While some may concentrate on the 52 set or another particular set or sets, I try to collect these things across sets from 1951 to 2015. It's okay by me for you to be the arbiter of the master set list for 1952. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1952 Topps PSA 4 #332 Baritrome | 1952boyntoncollector | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 35 | 01-23-2016 10:53 AM |
| Oh, gee. I don't know if this is a good deal. I'm torn | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-22-2014 08:16 AM |
| 54 Topps torn edge look? | 67_Palmer | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 18 | 06-07-2013 08:57 AM |
| Walter Johnson - Why is it torn at the top and bottom | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-01-2006 05:40 PM |
| Consignment Houses - I'm torn... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 02-01-2006 09:25 AM |
Threaded Mode