 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20
02-26-2017, 08:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Posting more out of frustration as a holder of MANY SGC graded cards but here is another example of the disparity in value grade for grade between PSA and SGC when there is no justification for it based on the card's condition. Pretty clear that Dave Forman took SGC the wrong way as the difference in prices on like kind cards have never been greater.
SGC ending tonight in Heritage (not my card) and is sitting at 50K out the door. PSA example is in Mile High and sitting at 102K out the door with 11 plus days to go. No insult intended to the consignor or bidders but the 7 is not as nice as the 84. Maybe focusing on increasing the value of the brand name would make more sense than increasing the cost of grading. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Should Seller Reimburse Buyer For Grading Fees? | Buythatcard | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 11-24-2009 11:08 PM |
| 1961 Fleer Baseball PSA lot (below grading fees) | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-25-2008 11:11 PM |
| Change in SGC grading fees | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-09-2008 11:42 AM |
| PSA T3 grading fees | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 02-01-2007 04:35 PM |
| Grading fees from PSA and SGC | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 06-30-2005 08:03 AM |
Threaded Mode