 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
05-31-2017, 01:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Bear in mind that as much as people love to fawn over PSA and how wonderful they are, that their standards have not been consistent over time. If anything the consensus seems to be that they are tougher now than they were in the past. Look at a PSA 5 that was graded recently vs. one that was graded 15 years ago. There was a lot more leniency earlier. Don't get me wrong, I think PSA on the whole probably is the most respected TPG and with good reason. But just like anything else in life, they aren't perfect.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| General Ruth question | Shoeless Moe | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 08-14-2016 06:16 PM |
| Grading questions in general and for 1967 Topps | George Baseball | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 06-02-2011 12:45 PM |
| General Card Grading Question | CowboysGuide | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-07-2010 06:15 AM |
| General Photograph question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-05-2007 01:30 AM |
| General Question about grading (opinion) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-17-2005 07:55 AM |
Threaded Mode