![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
He may be saying that he would take the conversion of any 9(OC) to an 8. PSA will normally automatically downgrade a single grade drop due to any flaw, but return a Mint card that's heavily off-centered either 9(OC) or PSA 7 or below based on their listed requirements on that page:
PSA 7: 75/25 or better PSA 6: 80/20 or better PSA 5: 85/15 or better PSA 4: 85/15 again PSA 3: 90/10 or better PSA 2: 90/10 again PSA 1.5: 90/10 again PSA 1: Not miscut So a Gem Mint otherwise card that's 89/11 can supposedly only get a top non-qualified grade of PSA 3, or it would be a 9(OC). That's why I never select "No qualifiers." Why not take a much higher grade and registry set value? 9(Q) = 7 for the registy.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My football rules complaint | billyb | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 11 | 11-11-2014 01:51 PM |
Leon, a very minor complaint | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 08-21-2007 02:48 PM |