|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I can't really think of a solid technical reason to group them or to not group them. A few ideas come to mind, but nothing solid enough to really get behind as it would depend on things I doubt we'll ever know.
The following is all pure conjecture. Like how were the cards packed, both leaving ALC and going into the packs. Some cutting sequences would lead to having stacks of the same card, others would lead to a more random distribution. Which of those they wanted would maybe determine the plate layout. Was there any attempt at getting a decent distribution in a carton, or would a carton purchase get you 10 of the same pose? Or it could be as simple as whoever made the art and masters preferring working on Portraits or more of an action shot. Action might have been done by more experienced workers as they sometimes added the entire background. Or it might have hinged on what was ready when they went to lay out the plates. I try not to ponder these things too much, the solvable stuff is complicated enough! Steve B |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 portraits vs. "action" shots. Thoughts? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 12-16-2015 05:47 PM |
| Portraits vs. baseball poses | paleocards | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 08-22-2012 08:54 PM |
| wtb: t206 hof action poses...around G | chaddurbin | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 09-28-2009 02:17 AM |
| t206 portraits and action poses | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 04-03-2008 03:32 PM |
| e107 Action Poses | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-25-2004 06:32 PM |