 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What is the most aesthetically pleasing T206 back design? | |||
| American Beauty/Broad Leaf |
   
|
10 | 6.94% |
| Carolina Brights |
  
|
47 | 32.64% |
| Cycle/Drum/Old Mill |
  
|
4 | 2.78% |
| El Principe De Galles |
  
|
16 | 11.11% |
| Hindu |
  
|
10 | 6.94% |
| Lenox |
  
|
3 | 2.08% |
| Piedmont/Tolstoi |
|
2 | 1.39% |
| Polar Bear |
|
40 | 27.78% |
| Sovereign |
|
8 | 5.56% |
| Sweet Caporal |
|
4 | 2.78% |
| Voters: 144. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#18
08-08-2018, 11:44 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I think we're all too biased. Like someone said earlier, Piedmont is a pretty nice looking back, but we've all just seen too many of them. I think if we really wanted to know which back was the most aesthetically pleasing, we would need to ask our spouses, siblings, friends, co-workers, etc and add up all the data. My personal picks are CB, Hindu, Broad Leaf, AB with frame, Cycle, Polar Bear, but I think my preference is influenced by the rarity of the backs.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What is the best pre war design? | mouschi | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 54 | 10-22-2016 08:25 AM |
| SOLD!!! 1953 Topps LOT of 12! LOWER GRADE-VERY EYE-PLEASING! Ends Sat 12-6! | GoldenAge50s | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 4 | 12-13-2014 05:25 PM |
| 1967 1966 1965 Topps Hockey Back Design | LuckyLarry | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 4 | 03-18-2014 06:08 PM |
| THE MARKEL REPORT: Are Graded Baseball Cards Being “Juiced” (Aesthetically Enhanced)? | WhenItWasAHobby | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 131 | 11-10-2009 11:51 AM |
| Graphic Design | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 05-17-2005 10:40 PM |
Threaded Mode