 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
08-16-2019, 08:55 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I'm sure it's been mentioned somewhere before, but how realistic would it be for a company to leave off the grades and give only facts from the examination? Example: "card measures exactly 2.48" x 3.5"; centering 52/48 L/R, 54/46 T/B; print defect near top left corner; 7/8 inch crease on left arm; chipping on back right edge".
No adjectives necessary. No "looks better than a 3" listings. A reputable, 3rd party, semi-scientific examination that lays out exactly what a card is - good or bad. It would be up to the buyers to take a closer look, interpret that information, and make a judgement call on the card's value. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A modest proposal | HobokenJon | T206 cards B/S/T | 18 | 06-26-2019 03:42 PM |
| Another proposal for AH Catalogs | Snapolit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 11-05-2017 11:40 AM |
| Proposal for a new section | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 03-30-2016 09:53 PM |
| New SGC flip proposal by Joe G. | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 06-02-2014 09:59 AM |
| New Proposal | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 02-04-2002 10:29 AM |
Threaded Mode