|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I guess my definition (and the one I try to use in building my own collection) is that the original/error needs to have been "meant" to be printed that way - whether intentionally (e.g. the '74 Washingtons, which is very rare) or absentmindedly (e.g. the '79 Wills, '91 Topps Comstock, '89 UD Murphy, or most inaccurate data on the reverse), vs. something that happened as part of the printing process itself - the NNOF Thomas, the '89 Upper Deck Sheridan (partially obscured "OF"), etc.).
The more I think about this, the more I suspect the 90 Martinez is in the latter category. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Show...me...your print variations! | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3125 | 11-17-2025 05:43 PM |
| 1990 fleer errors/variations | Rookiemonster | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 4 | 02-23-2016 08:49 PM |
| wtb or trade for 1990 UD variations | stimax2 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 1 | 02-17-2015 05:16 PM |
| Did anyone win Legendary Auction lot #52 - 1949 Bowman Print and Error Variations? | shammus | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-20-2014 03:58 PM |
| Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 08:58 PM |