REA's 1910 Cobb Sliding Photo LET THE BUYER BEWARE

prewarsports · #28 12-11-2020, 11:46 AM

I would not say it does not make a difference, I would just say who are we to decide one hundred years later that 1912 is fine and 1913 is not. Or 1919 is great but 1925 is not. In a perfect world where people are generally educated on what they are buying, I believe a photographers work should stand on its own, then a period of production should be listed (c. 1910), then the buyers should really decide. A 1910 print of the Cobb should be more valuable than a 1915 print, but this would play out in the market with all information available to the buyers, both however are Conlon's original work.

I have actually toyed with the idea when I sell photos of just having a small checklist.

Off original Negative Yes/No
Known Photographer Yes/No
Paper Type __________
Date of Creation __________
Date of Production _________

That would give you all the information you would need to know. Granted, a "Type 1" PSA designation checks off most of those boxes without saying a single extra word, it is easy to understand, and that is why people like it.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
T206 Cobb Reprint on ebay... buyer beware	Blunder19	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	4	08-04-2020 03:34 PM
SOLD: Ty Cobb Type 1 Sliding photo - 1912	Runscott	Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T	4	02-05-2015 02:13 PM
T206 fake cobb on ebay-buyer beware !!!	JohnP0621	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	10	05-29-2014 07:56 AM
Wow...Buyer beware !!	T206DK	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	6	03-25-2010 03:14 PM
buyer beware	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	3	02-15-2003 07:35 AM