|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think this is the new law Bulger is referring to. I'm not sure if I'm reading it right but it seems like they wouldn't need permission if they already had the photo's. I'm not sure if they mean before 1905 or before October 1908. It appears they could have used an older photo of Plank or Wagner if they had one in their possession before a certain date and included them in the set without their permission.
The date on this is October 28th 1908 [IMG] [/IMG]
Last edited by Pat R; 10-28-2021 at 07:01 AM. Reason: added info |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: T206 Molesworth Brown Hindu back | T206DK | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 03-03-2013 02:03 PM |
| T-206 G. BROWN WITH HINDU BACK | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 03-14-2009 11:49 AM |
| F/S T-206 G. BROWN CHICAGO HINDU BACK | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-13-2009 09:54 PM |
| Brown Hindu back on T206s | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-01-2007 11:22 PM |
| How much of a value multiplier is a Brown Hindu Back? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-06-2002 09:01 PM |