Quote:
Originally Posted by steve B
Some good points, but I don't see them buying a grading company or a breaker as a move that would be seen as anything but a huge conflict.
Owning a manufacturer and a breaker? No, no way they'd feed the handful of "special" cards to the breaker....
Same for having a manufacturer, auction and grader. How could anyone take those grades seriously if it was the same owner?
|
Don't disagree at all Steve, but the TPGs have already been rife with huge biases and conflicts from their virtual start. Look at all the people who have owned/controlled these TPGs over the years, and also been involved in the hobby as collectors themselves to some extent. Want to make a bet on which TPG they would submit their cards to be graded to? LOL Or what about TPG contingent grading fees based on cards values? In supposedly providing a completely unbiased and equal service to ALL submitters, it should take approximately the exact same amount of time and efforts to grade and slab a 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle card as it does for say a common '52 Topps card from the low series. So why the huge difference in grading fees? This is an absolutely inexcusable, direct bias and conflict of interest on the part of the TPGs, yet the hobby community forgives and allows it to happen anyway.
So, before you go saying these acquisitions of related hobby companies would make for unacceptable conflicts of interest, the hobby community for decades now has already shown they don't really care about such conflicts of interest. At least not as long as they can still get the "stuff" they want. Again, another old adage at work, "Stuff trumps everything!?"
05-23-2023, 02:27 PM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode