 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Am I unethical if I? SEE THREAD FOR COMPLETE QUESTION | |||
| Bend corners back |
   
|
29 | 19.46% |
| Rub off wax with panty hose |
  
|
17 | 11.41% |
| Erase pencil marks |
  
|
51 | 34.23% |
| Soak cards to remove glue, dirt or stains |
  
|
42 | 28.19% |
| Use acetone to remove ink or grime |
  
|
96 | 64.43% |
| Use other chemicals to clean and/or brighten card |
  
|
110 | 73.83% |
| Fix creases and/or pinholes with Kurt's magic spray |
|
118 | 79.19% |
| Use a black marker on the corners of my 1971 Topps |
|
138 | 92.62% |
| Trim off the fuzzy edges of the card |
|
122 | 81.88% |
| BONUS: Am I unethical if I submit my work to PSA and they grade it |
|
77 | 51.68% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 149. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#6
03-21-2024, 03:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I clicked the boxes for everything, but some of these are pretty minor in the category of "unethical".
Ultimately this is incredibly simple, but I know this group will bend itself into a pretzel to justify whatever is or may eventually be profitable. The average American types at somewhere around 40 WPM, apparently. "Rubbed off wax", "erased pencil mark", "removed ink with acetone", "Kurts spray for pinhole". These take literally less than 3 seconds to type into your listing. Why would you folks not just be open and honest? Far more time and effort is spent coming up with why things should not be disclosed than it would take to just spend less than 3 seconds to disclose it. The question is rhetorical, obviously it's because we want to stretch as much as we can to justify profitable things and pretend it's just too complicated or somehow ethical to not disclose rather than the obvious. I am quite hard pressed to think of a case in the world where a lack of disclosure in a transaction is the ethical path and where people without a vested interest would by and large vote for that. It's the opposite, and we all know that when we aren't trying to justify things to boost values or make more money for ourselves or our friends. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Corrected Poll: 1938 Goudey "Head's Up" Series | Snapolit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 05-12-2016 10:05 AM |
| Legendary Lot 72: 1909-1920s "E"-Caramel Cards and "W"-Strip Cards "Grab-Bag" | x2drich2000 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 09-02-2013 11:07 AM |
| 1921 Schapira Babe Ruth "Portrait" variations poll | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-18-2012 01:45 PM |
| Large amount of "e", "w", and "t" cards (and more) for sale/trade!! | shammus | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 12-19-2010 12:31 PM |
| POLL: Total population of all "known" Uzit T206's? | Chicago206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-22-2010 05:06 PM |
Threaded Mode