Quote:
Originally Posted by BioCRN
My dude, are you choosing to die on the "okay to have sex with children" hill? What in the actual hell?
|
Nice try, but I saw you palm that card. You know full well that the crux of this question is where does childhood end when it comes to sexual maturity and therefore where/how should the age of consent be defined? And that's a question that involves both culture and jurisdiction.
The age of consent right here in Canada was twelve until 1890 when it was raised to fourteen and then sixteen in 2008. Like I say, the question is cultural. A universal moral law it's not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BioCRN
My dude, are you choosing to die on the "okay to have sex with children" hill? ... I don't even know where to start here.
|
I'd suggest you not start with me at all. You'll lose any debate.
And if you think I'm going to be immediately cowed by "sensitive" topics such as this one (or race), you're wrong, very wrong. I'm too tough minded. I won't immediately fold my hand when these subjects are raised. I'll apply the same logical compass I use for any other question.
Like I say, I really don't give a damn about Pete Rose's sexual foibles. Any jurisdictional problems he may have as a result don't concern me.
Nor do I actually care whether he's in the Baseball Hall of Fame or not. It's no big deal. (As an aside Johnny Rotten referred to the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame as a "piss stain" when he passed on attending his induction ceremony.) Hypocrisy though I'll condemn every time. It's called freedom of speech.
05-14-2025, 11:16 AM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode