 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12
09-15-2025, 07:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I've always been ok with flaws. The really bad ones get put into the box of printing errors.
I am thinking of working on fisheyes, which I've always considered to be very transient. That bit of stuff causing it could be there for one sheet, or 50. I've seen some here that must have stayed in the press for a long time. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Print Flaws... It's Not Just About the $$$ | Pat R | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 12-30-2023 08:36 AM |
| 1968 Topps printing flaws question? | George Baseball | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 07-01-2021 06:16 PM |
| 70’s Set Collectors, which “flaws” are acceptable/unacceptable to you? | Vintagevault13 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 04-02-2019 08:05 PM |
| What card flaws are acceptable for your PC? | Vintagevault13 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 21 | 11-25-2013 06:02 PM |
| What flaws do you spot on this Ruth? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 86 | 04-23-2008 07:58 PM |
Threaded Mode