 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
06-28-2003, 10:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
unaltered but fake
Posted By: Adam J. Baxter
I have to agree that the even coloring is a little strange. I also find it a little odd that the seller has done everything to authenticate it, BUT have it graded. I do agree with Jay however that I've seen several legit OJ's with that faded, washed out look and I also have seen many OJ's that have that slightly uneven 19th century cut that runs down the left side similar to the one on this Sunday, so it could be real. The pros and cons on this card seem about even. There's probably no way to know for sure until someone wins it and has it authenticated or slabbed. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looks fake to me | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-26-2008 09:34 AM |
| Fake or not? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 12-21-2005 04:03 PM |
| Look fake? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 12-17-2005 08:37 PM |
| What a deal! Fake Ramly and fake signature to boot! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-13-2005 12:16 PM |
| Unaltered?? Corners look clipped to me. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-24-2003 10:50 AM |
Threaded Mode