|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: boxingcardman
Grading is not an objective truth, like math, as much as we'd like to think it is; it is a lot closer to art than science. I find that my personal grading scale is consistent with SGC's approach and I am rarely surprised with the results when I send them my cards. PSA has a different approach, one that baffles me on many counts, so I rarely send them any cards. Regardless, no third party grading service has the capacity to be 100% objective; mere human error associated with the judgments made in asessing a card will dictate some degree of randomness to the result. Cruise Ebay and it is easy to find overgraded and undergraded cards from every slabber. I suspect there is favoritism; I cannot prove it. I also suspect that most collectors have an overly optimistic view of their own cards' qualities. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What baseball card is considered Eppa Rixey's rookie card?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-03-2008 03:12 PM |
| Show me your grumpy faced baseball card and/or non-card images | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-02-2006 11:37 PM |
| A. Riemann, Confectionery Card - Is this a 19th Century baseball card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-10-2006 05:00 PM |
| First baseball card ever! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 09-11-2005 02:17 PM |
| OT: Need help with a non-baseball card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 08-27-2004 04:20 PM |