 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
02-16-2010, 10:57 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I would always side with accuracy over tradition when it comes to dating a set.
Use the US Caramel set as an example. It has long been listed as a 1932 issue, but it can be shown to be a 1933 issue. I realize that changing the accepted date on the set will make an awful lot of slabs inaccurate. But if new information comes to light, the "facts" as we all thought we knew them should change also. The subsequent data bases should also be changed, and if that means double listing, I'm OK with that. What about the old slabs? I don't care. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Run of Trader Speaks from 1-1974 to 10-1983 - Auction ends Dec.30 at 10:00 PM EST | jerrys | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 0 | 12-26-2009 01:20 PM |
| Baseball - Vintage Type I Press Photos - 1930s-40s Ending Tonight Nov. 6th on Ebay | D. Bergin | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 3 | 11-06-2009 09:25 AM |
| 2008-09 Japanese Baseball Card Checklist & Price Guide | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 08-13-2008 12:04 PM |
| Vintage baseball card Podcasts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-09-2007 06:13 AM |
| Current Issue of The Vintage & Classic Baseball Collector | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 10-28-2001 03:01 PM |
Threaded Mode