 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
02-16-2010, 11:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Philadelphia Caramel was definitely in the same region and even in the same "racket."
If this fellow was going to control the rights to Plank's image used on premiums, you think he would first try to control it in the same town with other candy companies. However, maybe ACC had a deal of some sort with Phil. Caramel and Standard Caramel (Lancaster, PA) and Lafean was more concerned with a tobacco premium which would reach a larger amount of consumers? Anyways, I hope the conversation keeps going. Rob 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The enigmatic T206 350/460 series....theory, checklist & backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 02-11-2009 01:38 PM |
| WTB T206 Marquard follow through | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-28-2008 12:34 PM |
| F/S: T206 Rube Marquard (follow through) SGC30 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 03-27-2008 12:20 AM |
| T206 Wagner-Theory | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 03-20-2007 09:33 PM |
| My T206 Plank theory....and, what's your guess ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 112 | 02-08-2007 12:43 PM |
Threaded Mode