 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
03-31-2010, 02:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I would crack and send
rather than crossover.
My thinking on this topic is that the card is what the card is, and it should thus grade accordingly....so why tempt anyone (no matter great a grader) with any first impression such as another company's slab?... just my 3 cents.... good luck with it.
__________________
www.thetriple-l.com 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| M101-5 Blank backs all SGC graded | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 03-03-2008 05:15 PM |
| FS - T215-2 Red Cross Oldring SGC 20 - $325/OBO | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-29-2007 07:48 AM |
| New SGC Slab for T3's. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 04-28-2006 12:17 AM |
| football HOF rookie lot of 52 cards all sgc graded | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 2 | 02-22-2006 07:24 AM |
| Question about card positioning within SGC slab. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-16-2006 07:25 PM |
Threaded Mode